Columns, columns, columns… Plus, everyone claims to have
the best column for your application. It comes down to four main factors:
low silanols, low trace metals, high efficiency and excellent symmetries.
Starting with an ultra-pure, metal-free, spherical type B silica is
just the beginning – a common starting point for all column manufacturers.
But, that’s where the similarities stop for us. We utilize an
unique form of proprietary triple end-capping and non-chlorosilane bonding
chemistries along with trace-metal level solvents at each step. These
unique steps results in an enhanced HPLC packing and column product
line that meets all of the main criteria.
Can your 5µm, C8, 300Å 4.6x150mm column give these results?
The HPLC chromatograph shows a typical Test Chromatograph for the QuikPrep
Enhanced™ RR phase packed into our high quality column hardware
(we only utilize IT Inc’s highly internally polished columns,
for our Enhanced™ RR range for optimum, reproducible results).
Request information for QuikPrep
Enhanced™ HPLC
We are not aware of any competitor’s 5µm, 300Å
columns which equal the performance above. Can your present column equal
the above….?
Similar high quality results are obtained for our 4µm,
100Å QuikPrep Enhanced™ RR columns, with p/m of 95,000 to
110,000 being standard. Yet, both are as competitively priced as any
quality 5µm HPLC column.
Can your 5µm, C18 or C8, 100Å 4.6x150mm
column give these results?
Our unique bonding and triple end-capping has been optimized
for peptides, proteins, LC-MS and difficult to analysis AI’s.
Why not test them for yourself?
How pH stable are our columns compared to other brands?
Sure, all our columns are stable to pH 1.5 – 8.5. What about any
application specific results? Single columns which utilized our unique
non-chlorosilane bonding of phase and end-capping have been used for
specific peptide analyses for over one year, with the column continuously
exposed to flowing or stationary 0.1% TFA, 49.95% DW, 49.95% Acetonitrile
throughout the year, without significant loss of performance.
Why
do most of our competitor’s use chlorosilane bonding? As a chemist,
does it make sense to you to end cap silanols with a trimethyl, etc.
chlorosilane, which releases HCl directly at the silica’s surface?
OK, you can use techniques to lessen the impact of this HCl. But surely,
you would agree with us. It is better not to have HCl released on the
silica surface when you bond or end cap?
This is why our QuikPrep Enhanced™ are so special.
We do not use chlorosilanes for phase or end capping. Plus, we use one
ethyl dimethyl and two trimethyl end capping stages while washing each
phase copiously with each bonding step.
In addition, most column manufacturers utilize high
purity solvents during bonding, end capping and washing of each phase.
We go to the extreme in order to provide a superior product. Each solvent
used starts as an ultra high purity solvent and is then glass distilled
internally to remove additional metals and contaminants that will negatively
affect our final product. Silica, as you know, is like a sponge. So,
while most column manufacturers offer a metal-free silica as their starting
material, what’s their final product’s metal content?
If
you are considering a semi-prep or prep HPLC column, consider our ultra
high quality line. Beyond what we have mentioned above as resulting
in a superior product, we offer our standard analytical grade material
in 4 or 5µm exactly the same as the analytical size columns. Many
column manufacturers reduce the selling price of their semi-prep and
prep columns by offering larger particle size (8µm & up).
You might say, I am already aware of this. But, did you know that when
they offer it in a 5µm analytical grade, often times, it is not
the same particle size distribution? Our particle sizing is selected
based on 90/10 size distribution whether in analytical size columns
or semi-prep and prep size. Many competitors use an 90/10 for 5µm
analytical grade but 80/20 distribution 5µm prep grades.This
greatly reduces the their final prep column cost of their product, but
also their efficiency.
How would you know the size distribution, simple, have
you tried to scale up a 4.6 mm id to 10 mm id or 21 mm id in supposedly
an analytical grade 5µm and failed? The most likely cause is the
NON-analytical grade particle size distribution of your supposedly analytical
grade 5µm phase in our competitor’s semi-prep HPLC column.
So how would you check this? First ask them specifically
about particle size distribution.
Next look at your test chromatographs for 4.6 mm id and your semi-prep
columns. Our 5µm, 300Å QuikPrep Enhanced™ RR columns
are specified at 85,000 to 105,000 p/m from 2.1 mm id to 21 mm id, our
4µm, 100Å QuikPrep Enhanced™ RR columns are specified
at 95,000 to 110,000 p/m and are the same specification again from 2.1
to 21 mm id.
If our competitors columns are high efficiency at 4.6
mm id and significantly lower with the same supposed phase at semi-prep?
We leave you to draw your own conclusions?
Now
consider the advantage of our bonding and triple end-capping on column
washing with redistilled solvent. By definition, if we wash four times,
once each after bonding and three end-capping stages and our competitors’
wash twice, once after bonding and once after end-capping, would you
expect our column bleed to be less? Would you expect our silanol activity
to be less? Would you expect our pH stability within our stated range
to be more? Would you expect our performance to exceed your competitors
column?
Remember what we suggested makes an enhanced HPLC column?
We think we did when we synthesized our Enhanced™ HPLC phases
and choose to pack our columns in the highest quality hardware we could
find. But, don’t take our word for it that these columns are special.
Why not try one for yourself?
Request information for QuikPrep
Enhanced™ HPLC
AECS-QuikPrep™
P O Box 80, Bridgend
S. Wales, UK
CF31 4XZ |
 |
TEL : UK (+44) 1656 782 985 FAX
: UK (+44) 1656 789 282
Web Site : www.ccc4labprep.com